Everyone used latest tech with design companies and XP upgrades. Wings of 10 for everyone, no exercising/aces, day missions only, I let the turkish naval bombers build up mission efficiency. I redid the testing with 50 bombers, and not crazily overcrowding the carriers which reduced their mission efficiency. I modded the game to remove light attack from the destroyers, removed all other attacks and AA. (which in this case would have shown you my point was solid and that disruption does practically nothing to fix the issue I raised)Ĭlick to expand.Thank you. Or you could have re-run my test changing what was needed to demonstrated your point. There was simply too many unknowns in your test to be sure without re-running similar tests several times myself, which I did but not enough to be entirely sure on underlying mechanics. Having at least one identical test with no CV fighters (again to clearly see the impact of dispersion on damage done by land based bombers). Having at least one more test (if not several) Showing or stating how long battle ran (to get a better sense of the impact/benefit of dispersion) Showing or stating how the CVs were damaged, that's a key point You pushed this to levels never seen in game with 10 bombers vs 520 fighters I assume to bolster disruption. More than 10 land bombers, like 50 minimum, I did tests with 50 and 100.Īt that level I thought I was being kind to your disruption point (less bombers against more fighters) in ways we never normally see in game. I'm not sure if this is a genuine question but I'll answer it anyway to help you see that 25% of half is actually a very good deal for you. That is, they were outnumbered 52 to 1, but still managed to repeatedly bomb those CVs and lose not a single bomber in the process. That managed great miracles every day, several times a day, and got past 520 fighters. what damaged the CVs? I presume it wasn't torpedos (amazing luck with no leader to hit all 4 CVs behind screens)? The only other possibility is your measly 10 bombers. any way you slice it, disruption is a very small consolation given how broken carrier fighters are.įor instance, your example. It might be (just) enough to save me from abandoning my current play through for a better naval build.
In that context then, you might believe me when I say I really do appreciate that you raised and are right about disruption. Haven't we all been there at some point? I've been repeating this punishment since HoI (that's HoI ONE for the newbs). It hurts even more when it's because of some borked mechanic. I've had one of those rude awakenings that I assume we've all have with this game, after sinking countless hours, I found I was wrong! And that hurts. I genuinely wanted to find I was entirely wrong about this, it messes badly with my latest hard-won Grand Plan for a Naval Germany. ?īare with me for a moment before you decide.
what if we settle for you being 25% right about being 'half right'. In one People suggested the issue was a bug that had confirmed. I found these threads from 20 and others on reddit where people complained about the same issue. Which they do extremely well against enemy carrier planes but otherwise it seems they're useless?Īfter encountering this I did a bunch of googling. I under built Naval AA and spent all that production and research thinking my Carrier fighters would do a good part of the anti-air work. Sadly this screws up my current game totally. In various game situations and subsequent tests I've not seen my carrier based fighters shoot down a single land based enemy bomber or have any noticeable impact. However, my carrier fighters were completely impotent against land based bombers, when moving through 'bombed' areas or in naval battles. In 1939 combat, I found my 1936 model carrier fighters (xp upgraded and with aces) are extremely potent and typically wiped out 80-100% of the UK/French CV-aircraft in naval battles. In my current game as Germany I built two conversion carriers and put only fighters on them. what is currently the best way to engage land-based bombers on NAV mission?
0 kommentar(er)
